Indian
Culture and Traditions
Foundations
Of Indian Culture
By Sanjeev Nayyar
Nearly five months ago I was talking about India with a
group of Americans when one of them asked me. Sanjeev, how has the Indian
civilization survived for thousands of years unlike the Greek or Roman ones.
Silence!
I found an answer by reading a book “Foundations of Indian
Culture 1962” by K.M. Munshi and thereafter decided to share learning’s with
you. Shri Munshi was an eminent lawyer, founder of the Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan,
one of the framers of the Constitution and a foremost writer of modern Gujarati
literature. This essay is based on the book. Where ever appropriate I have
chipped in with my own analysis.
Significance of Culture
The last fifteen years or so have thrown up many questions. Where do Indians come from? Why is family such an important part of our social structure? Why are we a non-violent country? And so on. Unless we have roots in the soil, knowledge about Indian culture, we will not be able to understand who our people are, why do they behave in a certain way and what they want. Instead of letting them blossom we will try and impose our ideas on them. Ironically foreigners find our culture fascinating often asking us questions that compel us to think.
The last fifteen years or so have thrown up many questions. Where do Indians come from? Why is family such an important part of our social structure? Why are we a non-violent country? And so on. Unless we have roots in the soil, knowledge about Indian culture, we will not be able to understand who our people are, why do they behave in a certain way and what they want. Instead of letting them blossom we will try and impose our ideas on them. Ironically foreigners find our culture fascinating often asking us questions that compel us to think.
What is Culture?
‘It is the sum total of values expressed through art, religion, literature, social institutions and behavior, the overt acts of individuals and mass action inspired by collective urges.’ Its first characteristic is Continuity.
‘It is the sum total of values expressed through art, religion, literature, social institutions and behavior, the overt acts of individuals and mass action inspired by collective urges.’ Its first characteristic is Continuity.
A distinctive culture comes into existence when people
develop a continuos way of life. This is expressed in many ways like common
traditions and norms of conduct, common institutions (marriage, family), common
memory of triumphs achieved (Bharata war fought at Kurushetra between the
Pandavas and Kauravas). Example where ever we go in India there are certain accepted
norms of conduct.
The most important characteristic of a vital culture is a
common outlook among the people, who when faced with adversity, difficulty can
generate a collective will to action. However, when the collective will to
resist adverse circumstances is weak the culture starts decaying (do you think
it is happening today, since a common will to tackle the country’s problems
seems to be lacking).
You might realize that that this is what is lacking in India today. We
have the Hindus who look up to say Rana Pratap or Guru Gobind Singh for
inspiration while Muslims look up to Akbar and Aurangzeb. How then can there be
a collective will to face the problems that India is facing today unless common
heroes bind us together. Nations are formed through amalgamation of identities
and not by harping upon differences continuously.
With the passage of time the environment changes,
society-culture come under pressure to respond. When this happens it is up to
the best among the dominant minority to adjust their outlook, institutions but
under inspiration of its Central Idea. When this does not happen the culture
dies and with it the people.
Take the case of a modern Greek or Roman. Both these
cultures have been overwhelmed by the West and are now where near the culture
of their ancient civilizations.
The vitality of a culture cannot be passed down from
father to son through a Will. Its values have to be recaptured afresh by every
generation and would be subject to constant reinterpretation. If a culture is
living the young would be impacted by it.
Gathering of Elements – The Vedic
Aryans
What is important in the study of culture is the way it is approached.
What is important in the study of culture is the way it is approached.
A humble way would be to ask, how did it come into
existence? What was the central idea behind it? Another way would be to look at
the conditions of the time in which it is studied. What changes are to be made
in the old forms to adjust with modern times? Another approach is that of the
Modern. If I had been Vyas of 3,000 years ago with the outlook of today, how
would I have shaped this culture?
To get a true feel of Indian culture we need to understand
the conditions under which it evolved, understand how it came into existence
and the forces that led to its growth etc.
How did Indian culture come to be
founded?
Millions of years ago, the land north of the Aravillis was under sea named the Sea of Tethys. Gradually, the Himalayas arose out of the sea. As time passed a huge land mass arose with rivers flowing out of the mountains bringing silt along with them. Thus was created modern North India. Its immense fertility attracted people from distant lands. The prosperity of N India is linked to the Himalayas. Today, forest fires coupled with deforestation have lead to lower rainfall and warmer climate. Unless this trend is reversed, we have a problem on our hands. In these days of low intensity conflict we must not underestimate the capacity of our enemies to engineer disasters.
Millions of years ago, the land north of the Aravillis was under sea named the Sea of Tethys. Gradually, the Himalayas arose out of the sea. As time passed a huge land mass arose with rivers flowing out of the mountains bringing silt along with them. Thus was created modern North India. Its immense fertility attracted people from distant lands. The prosperity of N India is linked to the Himalayas. Today, forest fires coupled with deforestation have lead to lower rainfall and warmer climate. Unless this trend is reversed, we have a problem on our hands. In these days of low intensity conflict we must not underestimate the capacity of our enemies to engineer disasters.
Indians are a combination of various tribes. Negritos came
from Africa, Proto-Australoids from Early
Mediterranean, Mongolians, the Later Mediterraneans identified with Dravidians,
the Alpines considered pre-Vedic and Vedic Aryans. U.P. and Bihar
were occupied by a race called CopperHeads. It is believed that the Nagas,
Asuras belonged to this stock.
The languages are Kol limited to hill tribes, Sino-Tibetan
limited to East India and the Aryan, Dravidian languages.
Before 2000 B.C. the Aryans entered history and spread
over Asia and Europe. Indo-Iranians entered India through
Afghanisthan. Zend Avesta, the sacred book of the Parsis contains several
verses that are found in the Rig Veda. The Vedic Yama is the Zend of Avesta and
so on. According to Bhagwan Dass Gidwani, author of the book “Return of the
Aryans,” Aryans were originally from India and migrated to various parts
of the world. Swami Vivekananda too said that Aryans were from India.
A section of the media and some noted historians (
according to some the British started it ) repeatedly harp on Aryan Dravidian
conflict and use it as a tool to divide North and South Indians into two camps.
Even if one were to agree that the Aryans were not more from India, what
these learned men tend to forget that the Hinduism of today is a product of
Aryan Dravidian cultures? At best they belonged to different tribes. But now,
is that not the case in most parts of the world? That cannot be said of the
invaders after the tenth century ad who, to this day, have a culture that is
distinctly different from the Aryan Dravidian one.
Aryans are believed to have re - entered India around
1500 b.c. For about the next five centuries they waged war within themselves
and with Dasas, Asuras etc. During this period there was a intermingling of
customs, beliefs and a new harmony evolved.
The Aryans brought with them cultural vitality and
influence. Their culture flourished in the Vedic Ashrams that were situated on
the banks of river Saraswati and in the heart of Sapta Sindhu, the land of
seven rivers.
Kula and Yajna, Rita and Tapas as the
Central Idea
The Aryans who founded Indian culture had certain basic social institutions like Kula ( family), the Jana ( tribe).The Aryans brought certain important elements with them namely the Horse ( an imp instrument of warfare ), powerful social institutions and a collective will to action.
The Aryans who founded Indian culture had certain basic social institutions like Kula ( family), the Jana ( tribe).The Aryans brought certain important elements with them namely the Horse ( an imp instrument of warfare ), powerful social institutions and a collective will to action.
Among the imp social institutions was the Patriarchate.
The father was the head of the family, its members and properties. The departed
ancestors were bound in intimate relation with the family. Grand-fathers, sons
and so on were one in spirit, traditions and property.
The family or Kula led to the concept of Gotra or a group
of families from common descent. A federation of gotras made the Jana or tribe.
Therefore the father provided the bonding to the family passing down traditions
from one generation to another. The family thus became central to every
person’s existence. It trained members from infancy, inspired by love,
sacrifice, pride of parental action.
Unlike in the West, where family does not function as a
support mechanism, here it is a very important part of our culture. The above
also explains why the father is the head of the Indian family. Another
important characteristic of Vedic culture was lifelong unity of husband and wife.
This explains why divorce rate amongst Indian couples is lower as compared to
the West. In fact, a recent survey carried on in England confirms that divorce rate
amongst Indians is the lowest in that country.
Another socio-religious institution was Yagna, the
ritual of sacrifice that brought men, their ancestors and gods into intimate
relationship. Behind the yagna was the spirit of sacrifice. Every human is to
offer his precious possessions (greed, fear, anger, hatred, and ego) to the
Cosmic Law releasing creative energy that can be used for productive purposes.
If performed in true spirit it was a means of bringing about the unity of gods
and men to secure desired ends, but was a means to secure lasting creation.
This could be one of the reasons why we Indians have
this spirit of sacrifice, desire to give. Over the years, this has begun to be
perceived as a sign of weakness. In international diplomacy, giving away
something without getting anything in return is bad strategy. Chacha Nehru led
the way in his dealings with Pakistan
and China
and subsequent leaders including Shri Vajpayee are unable to break away with
his legacy.
The ordinances according to the yagna were prescribed by Rita, the Eternal Law,
which upheld the Cosmic Order. Rita was all pervading, omnipresent from whom
creation sprang and by which life was regulated. Everyone, Gods included had to
conform to its ordinances. It was independent of gods and men. The gods were
its guardians, they were mighty because of it. Rita was not merely the source
of strength but also of beauty. Ushas the goddess of dawn was beautiful
because she was true to Rita. One could taste immortality only on the lofty
heights of Rita.
Satya was that aspect of Rita that gave
conduct the power to yield desired results. It produced results only when
complete accord between thought, word and deed of an individual. When men
prayed to God, their blessings had to be satya ie true to expectations.
Tapas Yagna could be fruitful only if
it is performed with the spirit of sacrifice or Tapas. This meant offering of
life through prayer to the gods in order to conform to Rita. Tapas is self-
discipline for attaining purity of mind and body. Scorning human comforts, it
gives self control to man. It transforms weaknesses into strength and
inspiration. Sublimation of the ego releases energy which can be used
positively.
Therefore, the central idea underlying Indian culture is
Rita, the cosmic order that is one and indivisible, operating in spiritual and
moral fields. It governs and regulates life and its evolution. It is Divinity
represented by a God. The manifestations of Rita have many aspects, its
fundamental values being Satya, Yajna, and Tapas.
It is a tribute to the Rishis of four thousand years ago
who saw this Central Idea in all its universality and through it sought to
coordinate all values in life and shaped, vitalized institutions, norms to
fulfill it.
The Vedic Rishi and his Ashram
Rita was translated into life through social institutions, norms of conduct and discipline which lifted the daily conduct into an act of Yajna. The ashram was the key institution where the Vedas were learned and practiced. The Rishi lived with his pupils. He taught them the message of the gods through mantras, how to worship them through sacrifice and inspire men to follow the ordinances of Rita. Each ashram was a closely knit family and not like the modern, impersonal schools of today. It rested on the collective support of the community who looked up to it as a source of inspiration for life well lived.
Rita was translated into life through social institutions, norms of conduct and discipline which lifted the daily conduct into an act of Yajna. The ashram was the key institution where the Vedas were learned and practiced. The Rishi lived with his pupils. He taught them the message of the gods through mantras, how to worship them through sacrifice and inspire men to follow the ordinances of Rita. Each ashram was a closely knit family and not like the modern, impersonal schools of today. It rested on the collective support of the community who looked up to it as a source of inspiration for life well lived.
In Vedic India, the Rishi was a not a
priest. He
was a teacher whose life was dedicated to the Gods and Rita. The first step in
translating Rita in life was through training in self-disciplined behavior under
an Acharya (a rishi of repute). He was a spiritual guide to the student. At an
early stage of consecration (diksha) a young person had to learn how to conform
to the Rita through vratas or pledges of disciplined behavior. Diksha stood for
a life of discipline dedicated to prayers, to learning and teaching. When an
Arya was consecrated he became a Brahmachari.
In succeeding ages our culture maintained its vitality
because it depended on this class of dedicated, self-disciplined students for
its creative vigor. A culture flourishes only when its educational system
imparts a sense of mission to the youth and trains them to lead a disciplined
life. If the new generation grows up in self-indulgence, then the system fails
to capture the values of the culture. Consequently, decay follows bringing with
it social, moral, cultural disintegration.
The above para explains two things. Why has the Indian civilization
survived inspite of many foreign invasions that attempted to
destroy the Indian way of life? The rishis and students passed on the knowledge
of Rita from generation to generation. Since they were spread through out the
country, even if an invader destroyed 25 ashrams there were thousand others
that survived.
Secondly, what is the reason for the current decay in
our society? It is to do with the failure of the current
educational system. I am not authority on education but do feel the mass based
education of today has failed to deliver. It is bookish, impersonal,
continuously harps on acquisition of material objects, does not teach us how to
handle life and ignores personality development. Instead of reading about
Indian books, we study European literature in Shakespeare and Macbeth. This has
made a substantial part of the urban population ignorant about Indian culture.
As a recent issue of The Outlook has pointed out, a number of urban Indians
between 20-30 years are using religion / spirituality as a tool to cope with
Stress.
Today, some of us turn spiritual after we cross fifty. Are
we getting the maximum benefit out of doing so? The answer is No. After having
lived most of our lives in ignorance and suffered there from, we turn
spiritual. Having realized the benefits of spirituality, some of us might be
tempted to ask ourselves, Had I done this thirty years ago would I have lived
life differently?
Brahmacharya was during the period of training only.
Marriage, children was part of the tradition. The student of a Rishi, dedicated
to Rita was looked up to as a leader and was to play the role of a dominant minority in society
providing insight, judgment to translate values into life.
The highest function which the Rishi had to perform was to
compose, preserve and transmit the sacred hyms. The divinity of the Vedas
became one of the fundamental values of Vedic culture. In a sense it was a
unifying factor and a source of perennial inspiration. Chanting of the Vedas was not
the exclusive privilege of the Brahmins.
The Rishis extended their sphere of influence through out India. In the
process Aryan traditions mixed with Dravidian, tribal traditions to become a
single culture. Aryan culture started moving South/Westwards. One of the rishis
Agastya is credited with being the father of Tamil grammar and poetry (so much
for the Aryan-Dravidian divide). The Namboodiri Brahmans of Kerala claim
descent from Parashurama.
There were a number of wars between the Aryans themselves
and with the Dravidians like the Battle of Ten Kings. Such protracted wars
appear to have ended the Vedic period.
Aryo-Dravidian Synthesis
The post Vedic period saw the river Saraswati dry up with the centre of Aryan power shifting to the banks of the Ganga. This period (i.e. around 1200 b.c. to 700 b.c.) saw the synthesis of Aryan, Dravidian cultures. Modern day Hinduism is a product of these two cultures. The fusion took place in North India.
The post Vedic period saw the river Saraswati dry up with the centre of Aryan power shifting to the banks of the Ganga. This period (i.e. around 1200 b.c. to 700 b.c.) saw the synthesis of Aryan, Dravidian cultures. Modern day Hinduism is a product of these two cultures. The fusion took place in North India.
The Aryans were virile and aggressive but their material
culture was not advanced as the Dravidians. They readily adopted the good
things. Marriages between aryans, dravidians, asuras and nagas were common. The
rishis kept on spreading Aryan values, culture, institutions, traditions
amongst all developing in them a sense of unity, continuity and a collective
action in social and cultural spheres.
Social groups who did not wholly conform to the Aryan way
of life were called the Shudras. The belief that Shudras were wedded to social
inferiority is a myth. Untouchability as we know in recent ages was unknown during this
period. The four castes was not a rigid hereditary institution
as is today. Many of the Mahabharata heroes had mixed parentage. Krishna attributed caste to qualities and action of men
and not by birth.
With the end of the Vedic age, the mantras were invested
as divinity. Thus the Vedas became the source of inspiration and direction for
future generations. The other institution that can be traced to Veda Vyas is
the Tirth Cult, the magnetic force that attracts people from Kerala or Kashmir to have a dip in the
holy Ganga. The concept of
having a holy dip was a tradition that carried on from generation to generation
and served as a great unifying factor amongst all Indians. To Vyasa we also owe
the Mahabharata. There might not be an Indian child who has not heard of this
epic. The T.V. serial only increased its popularity. A number of children who
were born between 1988 and 1990 were named Karan. In a sense the serial
reminded us of our glorious tradition, culture, and became a unifying factor, a
sense of triumph as Munshiji put it.
The Bharata war happened around 1200 b.c. The battle of
Kurushetra lasted for eighteen days. The epic has left two lasting memories on
the Indian pshcye. Vyasa the learned seer, the savior of the Vedas and Krishna the warrior and statesmen. One taught Dharma and
the other upheld it.
Now let’s look at Aryan Dravidian
syntheses
The Dravidian society was patriarchal like the Dravidian one. Polygamy was accepted as against monogamy favored by the Aryans. Shiva the Dravidian god was known to the Harappan culture was first identified with Vedic Rudra. Vedic gods Indra, Varuna, Agni, and Surya took a subordinate place. Ma, the mother goddess of the early Mediterranean people became the consort of Shiva assuming the name of Parvati in the process. On the other the Vedic god Vishnu became popular and shared with Shiva the leadership of the Pantheon.
The Dravidian society was patriarchal like the Dravidian one. Polygamy was accepted as against monogamy favored by the Aryans. Shiva the Dravidian god was known to the Harappan culture was first identified with Vedic Rudra. Vedic gods Indra, Varuna, Agni, and Surya took a subordinate place. Ma, the mother goddess of the early Mediterranean people became the consort of Shiva assuming the name of Parvati in the process. On the other the Vedic god Vishnu became popular and shared with Shiva the leadership of the Pantheon.
The Vedic homa got replaced with Dravidian puja, the
offering of leaves, flowers to gods. Spirit of tolerance and non-violence were
new values that evolved that as a result of the impact and the tapas (explained
above). The post
Vedic period gave a new shape to Rita, Satya, Yajna and Tapas.
First, the Cosmic Order, Rita, had a
new form ie the Supreme- Ishawara or Brahman, pervading and moving all that and
as Reality standing above all that is and that is not. In simple language it
means, from believing that the cosmic order was the mother of all creation, we
started believing that there was a Supreme ie God who was responsible for all
that is and that is not.
Secondly, the cosmic order in one of its aspects is the Law of Evolution.
By it the supreme self passes on from lower things to higher things till he
reaches realization ie man’s attaining conscious oneness with it. In human
beings it works through three important laws i.e. law of karma,
law of moral causation and yoga.
According to the Law of Karma, the atman or soul passes
from birth to birth on its way to realization. The Law of Causation is
an elaboration of the yagna (one of the Aryan socio-religious institutions)
aspect of Rita. Through it is possible for man to reduce the number of times he
is reborn by offering up his ego and by taking vows of non-violence, truth,
non-possession amongst others.
Thirdly, is Yoga, the elaboration of the Tapas
aspect from Rita through intensely pursued self-discipline?
Man is a divine essence with supra physical destiny which
he can realize through truth and self-discipline. Self-realization implies two
inter-dependant processes, one is surrender of ego and the individual self is
broadened into a universal self.
When we exercise self-control over our minds and body,
energy that would otherwise have been spent unproductively gets released and
brings the individual in touch with the beauty aspect of the absolute , when is
takes the shape of love, bhakti. Faith in this spiritual power generated by this love energy
became one of the fundamental values of Indian culture.
The Absolute descends on earth in human form as an avatar;
an aspirant by complete surrender of ego through love can attain him. In the
post – Vedic period, this faith appears to have grown. Thus at some point
Naranya (sage), Vasudeva and Vishnu became Hari, the Supreme Lord. In ch 11 of
the Gita, Arjuna sees in Krishna a god of
gods, the protector of dharma, the presiding deity of the cosmic order etc. At
the same time he sees in Krishna, Vasudeva who
has taken birth to re-establish dharma. He is the love aspect of God in whom
one can live only through single minded devotion.
In this way, the realization of the
beauty aspect of the Cosmic Order through Love became one of the fundamental values
of Indian culture. Now I understand why my temple pandit says, devotion to and faith in
God are very important if you want to be close to him. In order that these values revolving around the
Central Idea be translated into Life, a whole superstructure of traditions,
norms of conduct was reared. Social, economic, life was so molded in a manner
to find fulfillment by living up to the Central Idea.
This chapter is important for all those politicians and
individuals who have created the Aryan and Dravidian divide. Surely, they
fought wars but the product of that synthesis is what modern day Hinduism is
all about. Some western scholars have tried to compare Islamic, Christian
invasions with the Aryan invasion if any. These invasions destroyed our culture
and civilization while the aryan-dravidian helped both the cultures blossom and
grow. If there was animosity why is Lord Shiva worshipped in Kashmir
and Lord Vishnu at Tirupati. These are just of a few of the examples that show
how Aryan Dravidian cultures influenced one another.
There was racial fusion between Aryans and non-Aryans.
Veda Vyas was the son of a fisher girl. Balarama, Krishna’s
brother married the daughter of Kakudmin, who belonged to a race from
Saurashtra that existed long before the Aryans came.
Importantly, the chapter explains the new shape of Rita,
the cosmic order into Supreme Lord, the Law of Karma and Causation, Yoga, how
did Faith become a fundamental value of Indian culture and the concept of
Avatars.
The Concept of Dharma
During the period of the aryo-dravidian synthesis (1200 to 700 b.c) the fundamental values of the Vedic System became fused, got translated into the concept of Dharma, on which the structure of the Indian culture was built.
During the period of the aryo-dravidian synthesis (1200 to 700 b.c) the fundamental values of the Vedic System became fused, got translated into the concept of Dharma, on which the structure of the Indian culture was built.
The concept did not emerge from a single seer but was the
product of creative thinking of generations of dedicated men who presided over
ashrams. The aim of the rishis, disciples living in the ashrams was to live
according to Rita as preached by the Vedic ages.
India was then a continent of heterogeneous
tribes. The ashram was faced with two problems in the aim of aryanising all.
First, was how to bring about some cohesion between the tribes to bring in them
a collective consciousness? Second, was to create a social structure that would
encourage people to sink their differences and live up to the fundamental
values of Dharma.
The inmates of the ashrams who underwent this discipline
were called Brahmins. They were bound by their devotion to the Vedas. As the
movement radiating from the ashrams grew in strength, norms of conduct, social
institutions, and a way of life evolved with the intent of facilitating the
pursuit of Dharma.
The Vedic culture had as its central idea, Rita, the
cosmic order which operated in moral, spiritual and social planes. From it
flows Satya- accord between thought, word, deed that could translate Rita in
life, Yagna – complete dedication of one cherished things to Higher powers to
fulfill Rita, Tapas - is exercising control over body and mind. The Highest
Good was to conform to Rita by pursuit of Satya, Yagna and Tapas.
With the progress of time the three concepts listed above
were accepted as parts of Dharma. The human being who wants to live a truthful
life has to develop a spirit of dedication (yagna) and self-control (tapas).
The man who wants to lead a dedicated life cannot do so without developing
truth (satya) and self-control. And so on. That is how each value came to
embrace the contents of all three.
Tapas in its original sense signified self-control but
came to comprise truth and non-violence. The spirit of a non-violent India has originated from this
concept. India
has never invaded any other country in its 7,000 yrs plus history. The spirit of Bhakti originated from Tapas.
When a human being exercises self-control over his mind and body, there is a
conservation of energy. When this energy gathers strength it releases love
energy.
So Dharma came to symbolize steadfastness, self-mastery,
control of sense and anger, absence of malign and hate charity, learning truth,
non-violence, and bhakti.
In its primary sense, Dharma was the Cosmic Order which
upheld the whole creation. In its secondary sense, Dharma meant pursuit of the
Highest Good by living in conformity with the Cosmic Order. Dharma believed
that man was not the creature of environments but a meeting point of
hereditary, environmental, moral and spiritual forces operating through a
series of lives. By pursuing Dharma, he could alter the course of his future
and current lives.
The Law of Moral Causation, an aspect
of the Cosmic Order is universal for eg if truth is realized lasting achievements will
follow ( ie short cuts to success or achieving it by unfair means is not a
passport to long-term success ), if sexual waste is controlled vigor will
follow, if non-violence is realized love will follow and so on.
Another aspect of the Cosmic Order is
the Law of Karma which governs the journey of a mans soul from one life to another. It
is not fatalism. By internal change and action a human being can change his
conditions. According to this law, when we are born we bring with us
associations of actions of our previous birth. So also, actions our current
birth would affect our lives in the next birth. Its only acts that are inspired
by desires attract consequences. If our acts are not inspired so, they attract
no consequences. The chain of cause and effect is thus broken, the personality
is integrated and the soul finds self-realization.
Let me tell you a short story on how the fatalism, destiny
has been accepted blindly by the weak and ignorant. Devi Lal, a haryana farmer
(no offense meant) was told by God that he would live till the age of eighty.
At the age of forty his village got flooded as the Yamuna river was
overflowing. The village had to be evacuated. On days one, two and three the
people of the rescue boat asked Devi Lal to accompany them but he refused on
the premise that there was no way he could die since God had promised him a
life of eighty. Due to heavy rains he was forced to move to the higher floors of
his house at the end of each day. On day four, there was no higher floor for
him to go, so he drowned and died. When he reached heaven, he asked God why he
died when he was promised a life of eighty. God said, you fool, I sent three
boats to rescue you but you refused to take them. Surely I could not come down
and rescue you.
What this proves that unless a man uses his own intellect,
his condition cannot improve.
Manava Dharma
The way of life dominated by Dharma, shortly referred to as Manava Dharma had definite spiritual aims and purposes, are believed to be framed by Manu, held in great veneration by many.
The way of life dominated by Dharma, shortly referred to as Manava Dharma had definite spiritual aims and purposes, are believed to be framed by Manu, held in great veneration by many.
Manu Smriti has been the source of inspiration of the
later dharma shashtras composed during the last two thousand years. It has
provided a framework within which numerous tribes have, over the centuries led
a cohesive life without losing their autonomy. It has given our society social
and religious life, continuity and vitality enabling most Indians to survive the catastrophe
that foreign invasions brought along. My mind goes back
to what Allana Iqbal had to say “There is something about the entity of our
civilization that has defied destruction despite persistent onslaught by its
enemies over centuries.”
The basic concept of Manava Dharma is that if Dharma is
pursued earnestly by an individual, it influences his present and future lives
but social and material enviorments as well.
According to Manava Dharma, women as wives and
mothers have a respected place as guardians of the family, the norms of conduct
on which the unity and stability of the family rests. Their role is very
important as their fall from grace is a precursor to social chaos and cultural
decadence. It is they, who, in most cases hold the family together, listen to
the outbursts of other members in silence, love their children without
expecting anything in return. I cannot imagine home without mom and so would
millions of us. Women are in no way inferior to men. Having said that, God has
blessed with them with certain functions, traits and capabilities that are
applicable to them only. That cannot be changed. Moksha is open to them as it
is to men.
Leadership of the Dedicated Class
Caste System: origins and reasons
In order to reach the Highest Good, the leadership of society had to be a disciplined one. Life had to be dedicated to the studying and the teaching of the Vedas without any lust for wealth or power. Such was to be the life of the Brahmin. He was to dedicate his life to society, dharma. He was respected for his knowledge, spirit of sacrifice, character. A Brahman who did not meet these qualifications was looked down upon. While he was not subject to an extreme penalty he lived a life that was worse than others. He was shunned, ex-communicated. It’s like a sick man who does not die as compared to another who dies and does not have to go through the pain associated with sickness.
Caste System: origins and reasons
In order to reach the Highest Good, the leadership of society had to be a disciplined one. Life had to be dedicated to the studying and the teaching of the Vedas without any lust for wealth or power. Such was to be the life of the Brahmin. He was to dedicate his life to society, dharma. He was respected for his knowledge, spirit of sacrifice, character. A Brahman who did not meet these qualifications was looked down upon. While he was not subject to an extreme penalty he lived a life that was worse than others. He was shunned, ex-communicated. It’s like a sick man who does not die as compared to another who dies and does not have to go through the pain associated with sickness.
Modern World has been swearing by
Equality of Man.
The hard reality that different people are blessed with different intellects, temperaments, men are not equal. Division of society into groups based on common vocation, interest is common. Recognizing difference in temperaments, those possessing aspirations were Brahmins, those possessing energy with the urge to purify were Kshatriyas, those possessing energy without aspirations were Vaishyas and those possesing inertia were Shudras. The Kshatriyas and Vaishyas received education in the Brahman’s house but could not do the duties allotted to Brahmans. A Kshatriya was the protector and the upholder of Dharma. The Vaishya was the producer and distributor of wealth. A Shudra could serve the Brahman, follow arts and crafts, enter the army and when in distress follow the vocation of Vaishya. He could not study the Vedas but could study the Puranas, Epics.
The hard reality that different people are blessed with different intellects, temperaments, men are not equal. Division of society into groups based on common vocation, interest is common. Recognizing difference in temperaments, those possessing aspirations were Brahmins, those possessing energy with the urge to purify were Kshatriyas, those possessing energy without aspirations were Vaishyas and those possesing inertia were Shudras. The Kshatriyas and Vaishyas received education in the Brahman’s house but could not do the duties allotted to Brahmans. A Kshatriya was the protector and the upholder of Dharma. The Vaishya was the producer and distributor of wealth. A Shudra could serve the Brahman, follow arts and crafts, enter the army and when in distress follow the vocation of Vaishya. He could not study the Vedas but could study the Puranas, Epics.
Thus a place was accorded in society to each group
according to the duties and functions that it could perform best. If the west
truly believed in the equality of man, what was the need for Martin Luther
King? Inspite of material prosperity, there is racial discrimination in Germany; the
Blacks of America are poor.
The Dalits of today are critical of Manu Smriti, the caste
system etc. While I empathize with their plight and the problems faced by them
what prevents them from studying, working harder (not that do not), and facing
up to life to improve their conditions. Do they not see that there are poor
people belonging to the other three castes? Former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Manohar Joshi is believed to have come to
Mumbai virtually penniless. While some of you may questions the means, none can
deny the hard work that has gone into making him a prosperous businessmen
today. If a member of the backward caste can become a distinguished member of
the country’s foreign service and be its President, cannot others attempt to
reach half way? Are not problems faced by all of us? Are they unique to my
dalit brothers? Also read ‘Rediscovering India’ section Dharampal.
When two children of the same parents can have different
intellects so also can people of the same country.
To understand the social philosophy we must try and remove
certain ideas that we have been ingrained into our minds. Manava Dharma ruled
out a competitive society because such a society has a tendency to stimulate
egotism, greed, and untruth. On the other hand, by following the competitive
model, there is no equality either. Employment is uncertain and worry,
frustration engulfs you. Insecurity, frustration, tension, heart-attacks,
blood-pressure follow. In a competitive society, the strong will prosper while
the poor will be pushed towards the wall, their minds filled with envy and
hatred. Some sociologists believe that the riots in India are a result of the class
conflict between the have be and have nots.
Some of you might argue, that if there is no competition,
how do, we decide admission into medical colleges, employees get increments, we
bring out the best in individuals. Competition is a part of modern society but
it is our approach to it that determines our state of mind. If we were to enter
an examination hall worried about how tough the paper would be or start
worrying about the results after appearing we are bound to get stressed. On the
other hand if our approach were to be study hard, give it our best short and
leave the rest for the future to decide we would be much happier.
Manav Dharma takes into account the biological fact that every person is likely to inherit the traits and aptitudes of his parents. Family association would make more easily available for the child to uphold family traditions and value. Working with a community spirit leads to greater degree of cooperation. If one’s duties are clearly laid down the scope for greed, self-indulgence, a life of egotism is reduced.
Manav Dharma takes into account the biological fact that every person is likely to inherit the traits and aptitudes of his parents. Family association would make more easily available for the child to uphold family traditions and value. Working with a community spirit leads to greater degree of cooperation. If one’s duties are clearly laid down the scope for greed, self-indulgence, a life of egotism is reduced.
Some of you might argue that how system would work in a
globalised economy and in mega corporations like General Electric, Unilever. We
must realize that the Manu Smiriti was written thousand of years of ago. What
was relevant then might not be wholly relevant today. But the concept of joint
effort, cooperation, different traits in human beings are as relevant today as
they were thousands of years ago.
Summary
Creation is the outcome of the Cosmic Order. Rita or Dharma upholds and governs all that is. It operates on all planes, material, ethical, spiritual.
Creation is the outcome of the Cosmic Order. Rita or Dharma upholds and governs all that is. It operates on all planes, material, ethical, spiritual.
One can live in conformity with the Cosmic Order only
through developing Satya, Yagna and Tapas.
Efforts by an individual to attain the Highest Good not
only works changes in the individual but in social and material environments in
this life and lives to come.
Two important aspects of the Cosmic Order are the Law of
Moral Causation and the Law of Karma.
Dharma in its
social aspect of Manava Dharma must so regulate society that traditions, norms
of conduct make it easy for individuals to attain the Highest Good. To achieve
this society must be organised on a non-competitive basis.
Om Tat Sat
(Continued...)
(My
humble salutations to Sri Sanjeev Nayyar ji and hindu samskrit dot com for the collection)
0 comments:
Post a Comment