Makara — Myth or Fact? Dinosaurs in Srimad Bhagavatam
In
Sanskrit 'Makara' is a word that means ‘sea dragon’ or ‘aquatic-monster,’ long
thought to be a mythical creature in Hindu and Buddhist traditions. Paintings
and sculptures of this fantastical creature are found in India, Nepal, Sri
Lanka, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, China and Japan
— practically everywhere in Asia.
The
Makara in India is known to be the vahana
(vehicle) of Ganga-devi - the goddess of the river Ganges and the vahana of the god of the
sea, Varuna. A Makara is also the insignia of Kamadeva (god of lust) and
Kamadeva’s flag is called makara-dhvaja,
a flag having the Makara drawn on it. In Hindu astrology the Makara is also the
astrological sign of Capricorn. A little research reveals this strange mythical
creature to have been very popular both in ancient times and in our present
day. But is it mythical?
The
Makara is often depicted with the head of a crocodile, horns of a goat, the
body of an antelope and a snake, the tail of a fish or peacock and the feet of
a panther. Varuna is said to be the only one who can control the Makara and
does not fear them (save and except for Krsna that is).
In
some English translations of the Gita,
for simplicity of reading, ‘makara’ has been translated as shark. But it is not
a shark. The Timingila that is often mentioned along with the Makara in other
Vedic texts is classified as a shark – a shark of monstrous proportions. This
has been discussed at length in Krsna Talk #88.
Mahabharata mentions the Timingila and Makara as being
deep within the ocean, along with other huge sea creatures:
timingilah kacchapasca tatha timi
timingilah
makarascatra drsyante jale magna ivadrayah
“There
were seen Timingilas, tortoises, Timi-timingilas and Makaras, that were like
great rocks submerged in the water.” (Mahabharata,
Vana Parva. 168.3)
makarascatra drsyante jale magna ivadrayah
The Ayurvedic text of the 6th century BCE known as Susruta Samhita also lists the Timingila and Makara as being amongst the formidable species of aquatic life:
timi-timingila-kulisa-pakamatsya-nirularu
nandi-varalaka-makara-gargaraka-candraka
mahamina-rajiva prabhrtya samudrah
"The
Timi, Timingila, Kulisa, Paka-matsya, Nirularu, Nandi-Varalaka, Makara,
Gargaraka, Candraka, Maha-mina, and Rajiva etc, constitute the family of marine
fish." (Susruta
Samhita, Ch.45)nandi-varalaka-makara-gargaraka-candraka
mahamina-rajiva prabhrtya samudrah
In Srimad Bhagavatam, Makaras and Timingila are mentioned as predators, attacking Markandeya Rsi:
ksut-trt-parito makarais timingilair
upadruto vici-nabhasvatahatah
tamasy apare patito bhraman diso na veda kham gam ca parisramesitah
“Suffering
from hunger and thirst, attacked by Makaras and Timingila and battered by the
waves and the wind, Markandeya wandered through the infinite gloom that
enveloped him. Overcome by exhaustion, he lost all sense of direction and could
not ascertain what was the sky and what was the earth." (Bhag. 12.9.16)tamasy apare patito bhraman diso na veda kham gam ca parisramesitah
Bhagavad-gita mentions the Makara in Verse 31, Chapter 10 as follows:
pavanah pavatam asmi ramah sastra-bhrtam
aham
jhasanam makaras casmi srotasam asmi jahnavi
“Of
purifiers I am the wind. Of the wielders of weapons I am Rama. Amongst aquatics
I am the makara and of rivers I am the Ganga.” jhasanam makaras casmi srotasam asmi jahnavi
The
Makara is described in Vedic texts as half animal, half aquatic and an
aggressor — a true monster of the deep. Often depicted in art as having the
mouth of a crocodile, the body of a fish, the tail of a peacock and the paws of
a panther, the Makara has attained mythical status.
Now
the question arises – is the Makara a mythical creature or was it actually
real? And if so, then how could it look like it has been depicted in art for
centuries with so many different animal body parts? When one looks at recent
scientific discoveries and takes into consideration a bit of ‘poetic license’
that the artist may have employed, the so-called mythical Makara becomes as
real as life.
Recent
discoveries in archaeology have revealed what paleontologists call a Pliosaur.
The fossilized Pliosaur was found in Dorset, England in 2003 and took until
2008 to remove from the rock cliff in which it was found. Once excavated it
revealed a sea monster in remarkable detail.
Scientists
suspect the Pliosaur fossil is approximately 155-million-years old and lived
during the Jurassic and Cretaceous Periods during which time it was one of the
top predators of the oceans.
Paleontologist
Richard Forrest commented to the BBC as follows: "This is an iconic
specimen – one of the most exciting we have seen in years. It was probably the
most fearsome predator that ever lived. Standing in front of the skull you can
imagine this enormous beast staring straight back at you, fixing you with its
binocular vision, and attacking. Just thinking about it raises the hairs on the
back of your neck."
Dr.
Forrest went on to say that the creature’s bulky body, which would have been
powered through the water with four paddle-like limbs, has never been found and
may not have fossilized. Scientist’s estimate based on the 2.4meter long skull,
that the Pliosaur would have been 15 to 18 meters in length. Impressive indeed.
We
are herein suggesting that the Pliosaur could easily be the Makara of myth, but
we are not the first to equate a mysterious ocean monster to the Makara. We
have also stumbled upon the reports of a creature called the Ambulocetus, a
creature that could walk as well as swim. It lived during the early Eocene
Period some 50 million years ago. The fossil of Ambulocetus was found on the
coast of Pakistan from a time when Pakistan and India was a single island in
the Indian Ocean slowly drifting toward the continental shelf of Asia. Some
crypto-zoologists speculate that the Ambulocetus is a candidate for being the
Makara, yet most scientists suggest that the Ambulocetus fills the evolutionary
gap between aquatics and land animals.
Once,
when discussing with Pusta Krsna, Srila Prabhupada commented that there is no
discussion of dinosaurs in the Vedas,
therefore he did not believe that they existed. Then again, Sadaputa recounts
that when Prabhupada was asked about the dinosaurs he replied that they were
not extinct. So which is it? Is there really no mention of dinosaurs in the Vedas, or was Prabhupada
just denying scientific knowledge and discoveries because most scientists of
his time were denying the Vedic knowledge? We think so.
In
any case, we do find a reference to what easily could be understood to be
dinosaurs in Srimad
Bhagavatam when demons and demigods rode strange creatures into
battle.
grdhraih kankair bakair anye syena-bhasais
timingilaih
sarabhair mahisaih khadgair go-vrsair gavayarunaih
sivabhir akhubhih kecit krkalasaih sasair naraih
bastair eke krsna-sarair hamsair anye ca sukaraih
anye jala-sthala-khagaih sattvair vikrta-vigrahaih
senayor ubhayo rajan vivisus te ’grato ’gratah
“O King,
some soldiers fought on the backs of vultures, eagles, ducks, hawks and bhasa birds. Some fought
on the backs of timingilas,
which can devour huge whales, some on the backs of sarabhas, and some on buffalo,
rhinoceroses, cows, bulls, gavaya
[jungle cows] and arunas.
Others fought on the backs of jackals, rats, krkalasa,
rabbits, human beings, goats, black deer, swans and boars. In this way, mounted
on animals of the water, land and sky, including animals with deformed bodies
[vikrta-vigraha], both armies faced each other and went forward.” (Bhag.
8.10.10-12 – The Battle Between the Demigods and the Demons) sarabhair mahisaih khadgair go-vrsair gavayarunaih
sivabhir akhubhih kecit krkalasaih sasair naraih
bastair eke krsna-sarair hamsair anye ca sukaraih
anye jala-sthala-khagaih sattvair vikrta-vigrahaih
senayor ubhayo rajan vivisus te ’grato ’gratah
Here
we find a fantastical description of the vahanas
used in a great battle in horary antiquity, but some of the creatures described
have no English or Indo-Aryan equivalent such as bhasa, sarabhas,
timingila, gavaya, arunas, krkalasa and vikrta-vigraha. So what
are these creatures and why do they have no equivalent names in modern
languages? Could they be extinct? Could any of these have been what we now call
dinosaurs? We think so. The mere fact that the timingila is mentioned is proof
enough that some of these creatures are going to be formidable predators – which
ones?
Vikrta-vigraha translates as ‘animals with deformed
bodies’ and krkalasa
translates as ‘big lizard’. So when one’s opponent is riding a vicious animal
like a rhinoceros or a timingila — then is riding an ordinary lizard into
battle a good idea, even a big one? Krkalasa
is a ‘big lizard’ — think dinosaur! And vikrta-vigraha
are ‘animals with deformed bodies’ — think dinosaur! In any case, no vahana mentioned here
could have been ordinary, – even the human vahanas
must have been giants. So it is intelligent to think that if one takes these
narratives to be true in the first place, then what we think of today as
dinosaurs could surely be among the vahanas mentioned in Srimad Bhagavatam.
The
gavaya
mentioned in the above verse translates as ‘jungle cow’ and interestingly
enough these ‘jungle cows’ (also known in modern Hindi as nila-gaya, blue cows)
still exist in and around Vrndavana, India and, like the Makara, they have the
distinct characteristic of three animals — a cow, a horse and a deer. Once seeing
these strange animals there is no argument that they are a ’three in one’
creature. So why not a Makara with a mouth of a crocodile, a body of a fish,
and a tail of a peacock? You just haven’t seen one yet. But it looks like the
archaeologists in England are on to something with their recent discovery of
the Pliosaur.
It
is true that the krkalasa
and bhasa are
not easily equated with Tyrannosaurus Rex and Pterodactyl, but then again, why
not? It seems to be a matter of putting one and one together and moving on.
Yes
– there were dinosaurs mentioned in Srimad
Bhagavatam and possibly other places in the vast Vedic literature.
Unfortunately, it has been the thinking of some theists that the scientists
have falsified dinosaur remains (“The Devil put them there”) simply to give
credit to the evolutionary theory. But I think it is safe to say that such does
not stand against the repeated discoveries of dinosaurs in different parts of
the world and even in India.
Yes,
dinosaur remains and even dinosaur eggs have been discovered in Gujarat, India
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8671676.stm). However, when the fossilized eggs
were first discovered, villagers took them home and began worshiping them as siva-lingams (typical
Hindus).
When
it is obvious that scientists are not running around falsifying dinosaur
fossils and that dinosaurs did indeed exist in India, then it is reasonable to
conclude that dinosaurs are indeed mentioned in Vedic literature and that
archaeologists may have recently found the Makara in the fossil record in
England.
Admittedly,
the case for the Megalodon fossil being the Timingila as discussed in Krsna
Talk #88 may be more convincing than that of the Pliosaur fossil being the
Makara, but the later is certainly probable. Thus, it is worth reiterating a
previous point regarding the age of man.
According
to scientific evidence, it is estimated that the last of the Pliosaur and
Megalodons lived on this planet around 1.5 million years ago or before. That is
a long time ago, especially considering that the estimated age (according to
science) of the first human being was only 250,000 years ago. That would mean
that the Pliosaur and Megalodon became extinct 1,250,000 years before the first
human being spoke a coherent language, kept records or attempted to write
anything.
The
Pliosaur and the Megalodon appear to be the same creatures as the Makara and
the Timingila mentioned in Vedic texts. But what is so amazing or interesting
about that, and what is our point?
Our
point is that western scholars assert that the Bhagavatam was only written in the 9th
century CE, the Ramayana
in the 4th century BCE, and the Mahabharata
between the 8th and 4th centuries BCE. But if this were a fact, then how did
the writers of these books know about ocean-dwelling creatures, their size,
their vicious aggression and their diets if those creatures had already been
extinct for 1.5 million years? Bhagavatam,
Ramayana and Mahabharata
all mention the existence of the Makara/Pliosaur and the Timingila/Megalodon,
but where did the authors get their information?
When
(by scientific estimation) human beings have only been on this planet since
1,250,000 years after the Megalodon/Timingila became extinct — who told the
Vedic authors about these creatures? If there were no humans present on this
planet between the period when the Pliosaur and Megalodon became extinct and
250,000 years ago, how could the writers of the Vedic texts have known such
things? And it is obvious that they did.
Scientists
and scholars will have to ponder this question, but for us it is simple — there
have always been human beings on this planet from its earliest beginnings and
the knowledge of all such things has been passed down thru the ages via the
disciplic succession of gurus and disciples.
Bhakti Yoga - The Science of Self Realization
Who
are you?... Are you your body?
Or your mind? Or are you something higher? Do you know who you are, or do you
merely think you know? And does it really matter? Our materialistic society,
with its unenlightened leadership, has made it virtually taboo to inquire into
our real, higher self. Instead we use our valuable time maintaining,
decorating, and pampering the body for its own sake. Might there be an
alternative?
According to Vedic civilization, the perfection of life is to realize one's relationship with Krsna, or God. In the Bhagavad-gita, which is accepted by all authorities in transcendental science as the basis of all Vedic knowledge, we understand that not only human beings but all living entities are parts and parcels of God. The parts are meant for serving the whole, just as the legs, hands, fingers, and ears are meant for serving the total body. We living entities, being parts and parcels of God, are duty-bound to serve Him.
Actually our position is that we are always rendering service to someone, either to our family, country, or society. If we have no one to serve, sometimes we keep a pet cat or dog and render service to it. All these factors prove that we are constitutionally meant to render service, yet in spite of serving to the best of our ability, we are not satisfied. Nor is the person to whom we are rendering that service satisfied. On the material platform, everyone is frustrated. The reason for this is that the service being rendered is not properly directed. For example, if we want to render service to a tree, we must water the root. If we pour water on the leaves, branches, and twigs, there is little benefit. If the Supreme Personality of Godhead is served, all other parts and parcels will be automatically satisfied. Consequently all welfare activities as well as service to society, family, and nation are realized by serving the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
It is the duty of every human being to understand his constitutional position with God and to act accordingly. If this is possible, then our lives become successful. Sometimes, however, we feel challenging and say, "There is no God," or "I am God," or even, "I don't care for God." But in actuality this challenging spirit will not save us. God is there, and we can see Him at every moment. If we refuse to see God in our life, then He will be present before us as cruel death. If we do not choose to see Him in one feature, we will see Him in another. There are different features of the Supreme Personality of Godhead because He is the original root of the entire cosmic manifestation. In one sense, it is not possible for us to escape Him.
This Krsna consciousness movement is not blind religious fanaticism, nor is it a revolt by some recent upstart; rather, it is an authorized, scientific approach to the matter of our eternal necessity in relation with the Absolute Personality of Godhead, the Supreme Enjoyer. Krsna consciousness simply deals with our eternal relationship with Him and the process of discharging our relative duties to Him. Thus, Krsna consciousness enables us to achieve the highest perfection of life attainable in the present human form of existence.
We must always remember that this particular form of human life is attained after an evolution of many millions of years in the cycle of transmigration of the spirit soul. In this particular form of life, the economic question is more easily solved than in the lower, animal forms. There are swine, dogs, camels, asses, and so on, whose economic necessities are just as important as ours, but the economic questions of these animals and others are solved under primitive conditions, whereas the human being is given all the facilities for leading a comfortable life by the laws of nature.
Why is a man given a better chance to live than swine or other animals? Why is a highly posted government officer given better facilities for a comfortable life than an ordinary clerk? The answer is very simple: the important officer has to discharge duties of a more responsible nature than those of an ordinary clerk. Similarly, the human being has to discharge higher duties than the animals, who are always busy with filling their hungry stomachs. But by the laws of nature, the modern animalistic standard of civilization has only increased the problems of filling the stomach. When we approach some of these polished animals for spiritual life, they say that they only want to work for the satisfaction of their stomachs and that there is no necessity of inquiring about the Godhead. Yet despite their eagerness to work hard, there is always the question of unemployment and so many other impediments incurred by the laws of nature. Despite this, they still denounce the necessity of acknowledging the Godhead.
We are given this human form of life not just to work hard like the swine or dog, but to attain the highest perfection of life. If we do not want that perfection, then we will have to work very hard, for we will be forced to by the laws of nature. In the closing days of Kali-yuga (this present age) men will have to work hard like asses for only a scrap of bread. This process has already begun, and every year the necessity for harder work for lesser wages will increase. Yet human beings are not meant to work hard like animals, and if a man fails to discharge his duties as a human being, he is forced to transmigrate to the lower species of life by the laws of nature. The Bhagavad-gita very vividly describes how a spirit soul, by the laws of nature, takes his birth and gets a suitable body and sense organs for enjoying matter in the material world.
In the Bhagavad-gita it is also stated that those who attempt but do not complete the path of approaching God-in other words, those who have failed to achieve complete success in Krsna consciousness-are given the chance to appear in the families of the spiritually advanced or in financially well-to-do mercantile families. If the unsuccessful spiritual aspirants are offered such chances of noble parentage, what of those who have actually attained the required success? Therefore an attempt to go back to Godhead, even if half finished, guarantees a good birth in the next life. Both the spiritual and the financially well-to-do families are beneficial for spiritual progress because in both families one can get a good chance to make further progress from the point where he stopped in his previous birth. In spiritual realization the atmosphere generated by a good family is favorable for the cultivation of spiritual knowledge. The Bhagavad-gita reminds such fortunate well-born persons that their good fortune is due to their past devotional activities. Unfortunately, the children of these families do not consult the Bhagavad-gita, being misguided by maya (illusion).
Birth in a well-to-do family solves the problem of having to find sufficient food from the beginning of life, and later a comparatively easier and more comfortable way of life can be led. Being so situated, one has a good chance to make progress in spiritual realization, but as ill luck would have it, due to the influence of the present iron age (which is full of machines and mechanical people) the sons of the wealthy are misguided for sense enjoyment, and they forget the good chance they have for spiritual enlightenment. Therefore nature, by her laws, is setting fires in these golden homes. It was the golden city of Laìka, under the regime of the demoniac Ravana, that was burned to ashes. That is the law of nature.
The Bhagavad-gita is the preliminary study of the transcendental science of Krsna consciousness, and it is the duty of all responsible heads of state to chalk out their economic and other programs by referring to the Bhagavad-gita. We are not meant to solve economic questions of life by balancing on a tottering platform; rather, we are meant to solve the ultimate problems of life which arise due to the laws of nature. Civilization is static unless there is spiritual movement. The soul moves the body, and the living body moves the world. We are concerned about the body, but we have no knowledge of the spirit that is moving that body. Without the spirit, the body is motionless, or dead.
The human body is an excellent vehicle by which we can reach eternal life. It is a rare and very important boat for crossing over the ocean of nescience which is material existence. On this boat there is the service of an expert boatman, the spiritual master. By divine grace, the boat plies the water in a favorable wind. With all these auspicious factors, who would not take the opportunity to cross over the ocean of nescience? If one neglects this good chance, it should be known that he is simply committing suicide.
There is certainly a great deal of comfort in the first-class coach of a train, but if the train does not move toward its destination, what is the benefit of an air-conditioned compartment? Contemporary civilization is much too concerned with making the material body comfortable. No one has information of the real destination of life, which is to go back to Godhead. We must not just remain seated in a comfortable compartment; we should see whether or not our vehicle is moving toward its real destination. There is no ultimate benefit in making the material body comfortable at the expense of forgetting the prime necessity of life, which is to regain our lost spiritual identity. The boat of human life is constructed in such a way that it must move toward a spiritual destination. Unfortunately this body is anchored to mundane consciousness by five strong chains, which are: (1) attachment to the material body due to ignorance of spiritual facts, (2) attachment to kinsmen due to bodily relations, (3) attachment to the land of birth and to material possessions such as house, furniture, estates, property, business papers, etc., (4) attachment to material science, which always remains mysterious for want of spiritual light, and (5) attachment to religious forms and holy rituals without knowing the Personality of Godhead or His devotees, who make them holy. These attachments, which anchor the boat of the human body, are explained in detail in the Fifteenth Chapter of the Bhagavad-gita. There they are compared to a deeply rooted banyan tree which is ever increasing its hold on the earth. It is very difficult to uproot such a strong banyan tree, but the Lord recommends the following process: "The real form of this tree cannot be perceived in this world. No one can understand where it ends, where it begins, or where its foundation is. But with determination one must cut down this tree with the weapon of detachment. So doing, one must seek that place from which, having once gone, one never returns, and there surrender to that Supreme Personality of Godhead from whom everything has begun and in whom everything is abiding since time immemorial." (Bg. 15.3-4)
Neither the scientists nor speculative philosophers have yet arrived at any conclusion concerning the cosmic situation. All they have done is posit different theories about it. Some of them say that the material world is real, others say that it is a dream, and yet others say that it is ever existing. In this way different views are held by mundane scholars, but the fact is that no mundane scientist or speculative philosopher has ever discovered the beginning of the cosmos or its limitations. No one can say when it began or how it floats in space. They theoretically propose some laws, like the law of gravitation, but actually they cannot put this law to practical use. For want of actual knowledge of the truth, everyone is anxious to promote his own theory to gain certain fame, but the actual fact is that this material world is full of miseries and that no one can overcome them simply by promoting some theories about the subject. The Personality of Godhead, who is fully cognizant of everything in His creation, informs us that it is in our best interest that we desire to get out of this miserable existence. We must detach ourselves from everything material. To make the best use of a bad bargain, our material existence must be one-hundred-percent spiritualized. Iron is not fire, but it can be turned into fire by constant association with fire. Similarly, detachment from material activities can be effected by spiritual activities, not by material inertia. Material inertia is the negative side of material action, but spiritual activity is not only the negation of material action but the activation of our real life. We must be anxious to search out eternal life, or spiritual existence in Brahman, the Absolute. The eternal kingdom of Brahman is described in the Bhagavad-gita as that eternal country from which no one returns. That is the kingdom of God.
The beginning of our present material life cannot be traced, nor is it necessary for us to know how we became conditioned in material existence. We have to be satisfied with the understanding that somehow or other this material life has been going on since time immemorial and now our duty is to surrender unto the Supreme Lord, who is the original cause of all causes. The preliminary qualification for going back to Godhead is given in the Bhagavad-gita (15.5): "One who is free from illusion, false prestige, and false association, who understands the eternal, who is done with material lust and is free from the duality of happiness and distress, and who knows how to surrender unto the Supreme Person attains that eternal kingdom."
One who is convinced of his spiritual identity and is freed from the material conception of existence, who is free from illusion and is transcendental to the modes of material nature, who constantly engages in understanding spiritual knowledge and who has completely severed himself from sense enjoyment can go back to Godhead. Such a person is called amüòha, as distinguished from müòha, or the foolish and ignorant, for he is freed from the duality of happiness and distress.
And what is the nature of the kingdom of God? It is described in the Bhagavad-gita (15.6) as follows: "That abode of Mine is not illumined by the sun or moon, nor by electricity. One who reaches it never returns to this material world."
Although every place in the creation is within the kingdom of God because the Lord is the supreme proprietor of all planets, there is still the Lord's personal abode, which is completely different from the universe in which we are now living. And this abode is called paramam, or the supreme abode. Even on this earth there are countries where the standard of living is high and countries where the standard of living is low. Besides this earth, there are innumerable other planets distributed all over the universe, and some are considered superior places and some inferior places. In any case, all planets within the jurisdiction of the external energy, material nature, require the rays of a sun or the light of fire for their existence, because the material universe is a region of darkness. Beyond this region, however, is a spiritual realm, which is described as functioning under the superior nature of God. That realm is described in the Upanisads thus: "There is no need of sun, moon, or stars, nor is that abode illumined by electricity or any form of fire. All these material universes are illumined by a reflection of that spiritual light, and because that superior nature is always self-luminous, we can experience a glow of light even in the densest darkness of night." In the Hari-vaàça the spiritual nature is explained by the Supreme Lord Himself as follows: "The glaring effulgence of the impersonal Brahman [the impersonal Absolute] illuminates all existences, both material and spiritual. But, O Bharata, you must understand that this Brahman illumination is the effulgence of My body." In the Brahma-saàhita this conclusion is also confirmed. We should not think that we can attain that abode by any material means such as spaceships, but we should know for certain that one who can attain that spiritual abode of Krsna can enjoy eternal, spiritual bliss without interruption. As fallible living entities, we have two phases of existence. One is called material existence, which is full of the miseries of birth, death, old age, and disease, and the other is called spiritual existence, in which there is an incessant spiritual life of eternity, bliss, and knowledge. In material existence we are ruled by the material conception of the body and the mind, but in spiritual existence we can always relish the happy, transcendental contact of the Personality of Godhead. In spiritual existence, the Lord is never lost to us.
The Krsna consciousness movement is trying to bring that spiritual existence to humanity at large. In our present material consciousness, we are attached to the sensual material conception of life, but this conception can be removed at once by devotional service to Krsna, or Krsna consciousness. If we adopt the principles of devotional service, we can become transcendental to the material conceptions of life and be liberated from the modes of goodness, passion, and ignorance, even in the midst of various material engagements. Everyone who is engaged in material affairs can derive the highest benefit from the pages of Back to Godhead and the other literatures of this Krsna consciousness movement. These literatures help all people sever the roots of the indefatigable banyan tree of material existence. These literatures are authorized to train us to renounce everything related to the material conception of life and to relish spiritual nectar in every object. This stage is obtainable only by devotional service and nothing else. By rendering such service, one can at once get liberation (mukti) even during this present life. Most spiritual endeavors are tinged with the colors of materialism, but pure devotional service is transcendental to all material pollution. Those who desire to go back to Godhead need only adopt the principles of this Krsna consciousness movement and simply aim their consciousness at the lotus feet of the Supreme Lord, the Personality of Godhead, Krsna.
Om Tat Sat
(Continued...)
(Continued...)
(My humble salutations to H H Sri
Swami B G Narasingha ji for the collection)
(The Blog is reverently for all the seekers of truth,
lovers of wisdom and to share the Hindu Dharma with others on the
spiritual path and also this is purely a non-commercial blog)
0 comments:
Post a Comment